Previously "Stream of consciousness"
If all are valid.. all should mean the same!!! unlike with pointers... rite?!?
basically - from what i understand from the discussion in the newsgroup, all are valid and mean the same. but its better to have it in this order... storage-class type-spec type; static const int @naren: btw - why should the behavior be different with pointers??
sorry.. a diff context.. its alrite with ptrs as well!!
What I want to say is:
If all are valid.. all should mean the same!!! unlike with pointers... rite?!?
ReplyDeletebasically - from what i understand from the discussion in the newsgroup, all are valid and mean the same.
ReplyDeletebut its better to have it in this order...
storage-class type-spec type;
static const int
@naren: btw - why should the behavior be different with pointers??
sorry.. a diff context.. its alrite with ptrs as well!!
ReplyDelete